.png)

TL;DR: At most growth equity and venture funds, the investment team builds the investment committee deck.
At most growth equity and venture funds, the investment team builds the investment committee deck. You do not. The partner who wants your deal writes the memo and the deck, then defends it to their own committee. Your job is to hand that partner a package that makes the case easy to write and hard to attack.
The bar is high. In a survey of 885 venture capitalists, Gompers, Gornall, Kaplan and Strebulaev (How Do Venture Capitalists Make Decisions?, NBER Working Paper 22587, 2016) found the median firm considered 100 deals for every deal it closed. The average deal took 83 days to close, and the average firm spent 118 hours on due diligence and called 10 references.
Your pitch deck wins the partner. The IC deck has to win the room they report to. Preparing for IC means preparing for that second room.
This guide is for growth-stage founders raising from venture and growth equity funds. Real estate sponsors usually build the IC deck themselves. If that is you, start with What Should My Investment Committee Deck Include?
The fund's deal team builds it. An investment committee (IC) is the group inside a fund that votes yes or no on every investment. The IC deck, often paired with a written IC memo, is the document that vote rests on.
The deal team pulls from your pitch deck, your model, your data room and what they learned in diligence. Then they add their own view: the investment thesis, the price, the expected return and the risks.
The committee will read the deck like a skeptic. Every number has to trace back to your files.
A pitch deck wins interest. An IC deck wins a formal vote.
| Pitch deck | IC deck | |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Win a partner's interest and a next meeting | Win a formal yes vote |
| Who builds it | You | The fund's deal team, from your materials |
| Audience | One partner or a small team | The full committee |
| Financials | Headline metrics and the ask | Full model, scenarios and assumptions |
| Risk | A slide or less | Named risks, mitigants and a stress case |
| Terms | The raise amount | Price, structure and governance |
IRC Partners covers this split in more depth in IC Deck vs Investor Presentation. Both documents should come from the same reconciled model. If they do not, the committee finds the gap.
An IC memo lays out why the fund should invest, at what price, and what could go wrong. Most memos cover the same core parts:
| Memo section | What it covers | What the committee checks |
|---|---|---|
| Recommendation | The deal, the check size and the vote the team asks for | Is the ask clear? |
| Investment thesis | Why this company, why now and why this fund | Does the deal fit the fund's mandate? |
| Business and market | What the company does and how big the market is | Is the market big enough for the return the fund needs? |
| Financials | History, the forecast and the key assumptions | Does the forecast tie to the historical numbers? |
| Valuation and returns | The price, the expected return and how the fund gets its money back | Does the return clear the fund's target? |
| Risks and mitigants | What could break the plan and what the team will do about it | Is there a downside case and a stress case? |
| Diligence findings | What checked out, what surprised the team and how you answered | Were the open questions answered? |
| Terms | The structure, board seats and investor protections | Do the terms protect the fund? |
Every part of that memo leans on a file you provided. A gap in your files becomes a gap in the memo.
A growth equity committee asks whether the revenue is real, whether growth can scale, and whether this team can run a bigger company. Your deal partner will face these questions in that room. Expect them:
Expect the team question to carry the most weight. In the same Gompers study, more than 55% of venture capitalists named the team as the most important factor in their decisions.
The objections that sink a deck in committee follow a pattern. IRC Partners lists them in Investment Committee Deck Feedback From Institutional Investors.
If your partner has to come back to you for these answers after the meeting, the deal loses time. If the answers are already in the data room, your partner walks in ready.
Hand your deal partner an IC-ready package. It should include:
This package does two jobs. It gives your partner the raw material for the memo. It also shows the committee a team that runs a tight process.
Build the risk slide around three scenarios. Committees trust a plan that shows its downside. A clean base case with no stress test reads as untested.
For each one, show what changed, by how much, and what happens to revenue, cash runway and the return. Then name the plan for each risk. IRC Partners walks through this format in How to Present Risk in an IC Deck.
Hand your deal partner this work. It is the slide they most need and the one founders most often skip.
Real estate sponsors and fund managers raising from institutional LPs often build the committee package themselves. The LP's team reviews it and passes it up to their own committee. If that is your case, you are building the IC deck, and everything above applies directly. IRC Partners covers the sponsor version in How to Structure an IC Deck for $20M and What Metrics Matter Most in an IC Deck.
LP committees also work from a standard checklist. ILPA, the main trade group for institutional LPs, released its standard due diligence questionnaire, the ILPA DDQ 2.0, in November 2021 to standardize the most frequent and important diligence questions. Expect your package to be read against it.
For a sponsor or fund manager, the committee adds four questions:
Keep the pitch deck short. IRC Partners' guidance is 12 to 22 slides. An IC deck runs longer, usually 25 to 40 pages, with an appendix for the detailed math.
Length matters less than order. Lead with the answer: what the deal is, why it wins and what it returns. Put risk right after the return case and before the appendix. A committee member who reads only the first five pages should still know the case. For layout rules, see Best Practices for IC Deck Design.
This is a made-up example. It is not an IRC Partners client and the numbers are for illustration only.
A software company is raising a $25M growth round. After two partner meetings, the lead partner tells the founder the deal goes to committee in three weeks.
The founder sends the six-item package within two days. The deal team builds the memo from it. Two questions come back: churn in one customer group, and a sales leader hire. Both answers are already in the diligence log and the risk list, so the founder replies the same day.
The partner walks into committee with every number tied to a file. The founder never sees the IC deck. The work that matters happened in the package.
Your partner can only defend what your files support. If the model, cap table or data room has a gap, the committee will find it in that room, where you are not there to answer.
The Capital Raise Pre-Flight is IRC Partners' fixed-fee readiness audit. It reviews your package across 12 gates, including Pitch Deck, Decision Friction and Mandate Alignment, so your materials are ready before a deal team takes them to committee.
Usually not. At growth equity and venture funds, the deal team writes the IC deck and memo. Founders supply the materials it rests on. Real estate sponsors raising from institutional LPs often build the committee package themselves.
A pitch deck wins a partner's interest and a next meeting. An IC deck supports a formal yes or no vote, with full financials, scenarios, terms and named risks.
A one-page summary, a reconciled model with scenarios, cohort and retention data, a clean cap table, a risk list and a log of diligence questions and answers.
In the Gompers, Gornall, Kaplan and Strebulaev survey of 885 venture capitalists, the average deal took 83 days to close and the average firm spent 118 hours on due diligence.
IRC Partners' guidance is 25 to 40 pages with an appendix. Order matters more than length: lead with the answer and put risk right after the return case.
Mandate alignment is how well your deal fits what the fund is built to invest in: check size, stage, sector, geography and return target. A deal outside the mandate rarely reaches committee.
IRC Partners advises founders and sponsors raising $5M to $250M of institutional capital. We take 7 strategic partners per quarter. To talk with our team about your raise, start HERE.
You get one shot to raise the right way. If this raise is worth doing, it’s worth doing with precision, leverage, and control.
This isn’t a practice run. Serious capital. Serious strategy. Let’s raise it right.
We onboard a maximum of seven
new strategic partners each quarter, by application only, to maximize your chances of securing the capital you need.